
Relations with the State of Israel are at the lowest point in 35 years. The Obama administration has never liked the fact that "Bibi" Netanyahu is Prime Minister. He is not an Israeli who will do just about anything to preserve the strategic alliance with the United States particularly in face of the fact that his country is facing the most serious existential threat in its history.
From the first days of this presidency, it has been clear that the President’s intention was to open up and broaden strategic and political relationships with the Arab countries of the region. Further they intended to broaden that effort to include the establishment of a substantive dialogue and possible thaw with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
This has been a confusing policy to not only Israel but to the Sunni Arab world who for the most part view the “Persian” effort at religious and geographic hegemony as a major threat to them also. The Iranians, driven by religious fanaticism that most of the west doesn’t understand or chooses to disregard, wants their dreams of a Caliphate to come equipped with nuclear warheads for use in the first instance on Israel.
This is the “Mein Kampf” moment for the United States and the rest of the world. The mullahs of Teheran with Ali Khamenei and Amadinejad in control are deadly serious about the annihilation of Israel. This is not the tired and cynical game the Arabs have played for decades that uses the Palestinians as useful pawns to enrich themselves with foreign aid, weapons, and oil revenues in exchange for an ersatz peace. The real truth is that peace in the Middle East has never at its core, really been about Israel as a homeland for Jews until the Islamists reentered the picture and pan-Arabism departed. The new reality is now the old reality that was historically operational from the Crusades to the end of the Ottoman Empire…a struggle about the essential nature of God.
Obama has decided that despite there ever really having been a serious partner for peace in either Fatah or certainly Hamas, he will dispel the perception of American bias toward Israel by forcing Netanyahu and the “hard liners” into a corner where it gives the U.S. the space it needs to situate the Arabs on an equal platform with Israel. The essence of this is not wholly because of strategic concerns. There is a long festering attitude at work here that adheres to the premise that the main obstacle to regional stability (forget peace) is the existence of Israel itself.
Obama has foregone the opportunity to align himself with the anti regime protestors in Iran. By doing so he has painted a portrait of himself as someone who is either hopelessly naïve or someone who has decided that Islam is more important to his vision of America than three to four million Jews surrounded by people who hate them. He has reinforced this image by indulging in moral relativism by having Clinton, Biden and Gibbs vehemently denounce the accidental announcement of the construction of 1600 new housing units in a Jewish section of East Jerusalem while remaining silent while the PA dedicated a public square in Ramallah to a “Shaheeda” who blew up 38 people including one American and thirteen children.
This is the same kind of anti-Israeli garbage that was the centerpiece of the “infamous “
Goldstone Report and part and parcel of the anti-Israeli/anti-Semitic worldview that most of the “hard “ left in most parts of the world have adopted as gospel.
These people are the core of the Obama vote in this country. They are “intifada” leftists and while the President does not directly play to them in overt ways, the histrionic public scolding of the democratically elected leader of a country under siege by religious maniacs sends an unmistakable message to them that their guy knows who the “real” bad guys are.
So where is all of this taking us? One theory that starts to gain credence is that this administration has made a fateful decision to swing toward the Arabs for long term economic and political reasons. Another more sinister interpretation is that Obama is positioning the U.S. to be able to walk away from supporting any pre-emptive strike by Israel on the Iranian nuclear and military facilities. The fact that a lack of symbolic or material American support for such an event could mean potential catastrophe for Israel would, under this theory, seem to mean that Obama has decided to throw the Jews under the bus while possibly neutering the Ayatollahs in the process. The consequences of such a fateful decision could potentially be so tragic, reckless and disastrous that the already fragile global world order would break apart while a second Shoah takes place.
This President has already shown that public opinion holds little sway for him in either domestic or foreign matters. While some view this as a principled toughness, far more are seeing it as an arrogance born of a radical worldview that was disguised by endless generalities during the two year campaign. Now Obama the campaigner is in the real world and his inability to see reality and the potentially deadly consequences of his actions put us all in peril. A less harsh assessment of his motives is that he is simply in over his head. He is not a real President but he plays one on TV. If either is true it is not just Israel facing an existential threat.
ERLANDSSON


